|
The possibility that asthma may be caused by a reaction to a substance or substances
present at the patient's place of work will only be identified if either the patient, or the
patient's doctor, is aware of the possibility and prepared to consider it. Because this is not
always the case a proportion of occupational asthma cases get missed. This is
unfortunate since it is a potentially preventable condition, although complete cure may only
be possible if the responsible occupational agent is recognised and avoided early, before
there is irreversible damage to the patient's airways.

How is occupational asthma diagnosed?
The symptoms of occupational asthma may have a clear time relationship either with the time
of starting a new job – or with the time of changing
exposures within a job. More importantly, symptoms may tend to improve when the patient
is away from work, although the weekend might not be sufficiently long for this to be obvious. The clinical
history of the disease is therefore important in establishing the diagnosis, as is a detailed knowledge of
occupational processes and exposures. It can be very helpful if the patients keeps a
daily peak flow chart (i.e. takes regular
measurements through a peak flow meter), tell-tale
improvements either at the weekend or during holiday times can then give the game away.
Otherwise, the necessary investigations are similar to those
required for ordinary asthma and for other allergic
diseases.
In the UK and across western Europe, it is believed that about 10% of adult asthma is of
the occupational type although most of these cases probably go unrecognised.
Although this figure is as precise as there is, it results from an analysis of several separate epidemiological studies, and may
represent two rather distinct types of case.
|

|
Occupational
asthma
The name used when there is evidence
that sensitisation to something in the workplace was the initial asthma trigger.
|
|

|
Work-related
asthma
The name used when in all
probability the asthma tendency pre-existed (i.e it was constitutional) but has been provoked or exacerbated by
workplace exposure.
|
Although the precise numbers are not know, it is likely that true
occupational asthma is
likely to be less common than work-related asthma. The distinction is an important one,
not least because there is likely to be a greater need for career change and there may well be
medico-legal consequences.
So
whilst it is difficult to be sure about the number
of cases, a study from the University of Manchester
shows that reported cases are declining, the exact
reasons for this (it may partly be due to a laxity
in reporting) are unclear.

|
|
Occupational asthma in Great Britain to 2007 |
|
Whatever the
true situation, the number of new cases
that are reported each year in the UK are likely to
represent a considerable underestimation of the true incidence.

What causes occupational asthma?
Over 300 different items have been identified as capable of causing asthma, although three-quarters of
all the cases identified in the UK are caused by around a dozen compounds. These are
listed below:
|

|
Di-isocyanates
These are highly reactive chemicals
used widely in industry. These compounds are believed to be the commonest single agent
known to give rise
to occupational asthma.
|
|

|
Laboratory
animals
Allergy to skin and salivary proteins from laboratory animals causes asthma and rhinitis
in susceptible handlers.
|
|

|
Flour
Flour can cause occupational asthma in bakery
workers.
|
|

|
A
variety of enzymes
These can cause occupational asthma in those exposed
to them.
|
|

|
Rubber
latex
Latex can cause allergic reactions including asthma in susceptible
nurses, doctors and dentists from the increasing dependence on latex gloves in their work.
|
|

|
Solder
fumes
The compound known as colophony causes
both rhinitis and asthma symptoms in susceptible individuals.
|

Is it under-diagnosed?
Although in many cases the association between the asthma and the occupation is fairly
obvious, in many cases the asthma is so indistinguishable from standard asthma that the
association can easily be overlooked. Even more confusingly, patients may not fully improve
until all exposure to the causative agent is prevented and in many cases this may require a change of
occupation. Such are the social and economic consequences of occupational and work-related asthma,
patients may be reluctant to take this bold step and may therefore be denied the only fully
satisfactory way of establishing the completeness of the relationship beyond
doubt.
Around one case in four is diagnosed and managed within the occupational health
service. Not surprisingly these these
cases tend to be diagnosed earlier and are less severely affected than those identified by chest
physicians.

|